-
THE PROTECTION OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK IS CHANGED EXCLUSIVELY WITH NEW TURKISH INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAW.Court of Appeals 11.HD. Decision 2000/7300 E. 2000/9419 K. dated 28.11.2000 "... proprietary trademark and industrial design owner may use the trademark and design unless such registration is nullified. The case was opened on 5.6.1998. On the other hand, the defendant registered the industrial design of the package "Protel" on 15.1.1997 and the commodity mark of the same name...
-
THE PROTECTION OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK IS CHANGED EXCLUSIVELY WITH NEW TURKISH INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAW.-2
Court of Appeals 11.HD. Decision 2000/7300 E. 2000/9419 K. dated 28.11.2000 "... proprietary trademark and industrial design owner may use the trademark and design unless such registration is nullified. The case was opened on 5.6.1998. On the other hand, the defendant registered the industrial design of the package "Protel" on 15.1.1997 and the commodity mark of the same name...
-
THE PROTECTION OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK IS CHANGED EXCLUSIVELY WITH NEW TURKISH INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAW.Court of Appeals 11.HD. Decision no 2002/5666 E. 2003/3612 K of 14.04.2003 "... The case relates to the cancellation of the Industrial Design Registration Certificate and the request to prevent unfair competition. Owners of proprietary industrial designs may use the design unless such proprietary rights are nullified. The original case was opened on 11.12.1997 and the merger case was...
-
SIMILARITY CRITERIA FOR DRUG BRANDS IN TURKEY -1Decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals 11. HD 2009/13331 E. 2011/5967 K. dated 16/05/2011 "The claim made by the plaintiff by the defendant company on the grounds of the trademark" PIOZON "for the application made by the plaintiff to the Turkish Patent Institute for the registration of the trademark" PLIAZON "was rejected by the Turkish Patent Institute Re-examination...
-
SIMILARITY CRITERIA FOR DRUG BRANDS IN TURKEY - 2
Decision no. 2002/7864 E. 2003/64 K dated 13.01.2003 of the Supreme Court of Appeals "In the report of the expert committee dated 04.12.2001, it is stated that the products of the case in question are medicines, the patient who uses the medicines does not choose the medication on his / her own request, he / she has to comply with the preference of the physician and the medicines are sold by...
-
SIMILARITY CRITERIA FOR DRUG BRANDS IN TURKEY - 3
Decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal 11. HD on 09/10/2006 dated 2005/9355 E. 2006/9933 "The plaintiff and his representative stated that the objection of the client is that the applicant has acted in the field of medicine and that the trademark" ACTOS "registered on 27.01.2000 is owned by the 5th product and that the claimant has applied to register the" ATOKS` statement in...
